This section should immediately precede the abstract. I also try to cite a specific factual reason or some evidence for any major criticisms or suggestions that I make. Thereafter use the abbreviation only. Acknowledgements Collate acknowledgements in a separate section at the end of the article before the references and do not, therefore, include them on the title page, as a footnote to the title or otherwise.
Upon submitting, you will be prompted to select the type of submission e.
This section should immediately precede the abstract.
Manuscript Format Initial Submission. Supporting information will be published exactly as supplied and it is the author's responsibility to ensure that the material is logically laid out, adequately described, and is in a format that is likely to be accessible to readers. OnlineOpen is available to authors who wish to make their article available to non-subscribers upon publication, or whose funding agency requires grantees to archive the final version of their article.
Although it is still uncertain whether this increase in downloads and visitors translates into an increased citation rate, the greater visibility achieved with OA may allow you to reach potential collaborators more easily. I then delve into the Methods and Results sections. Supporting information will be published exactly as supplied and it is the author's responsibility to ensure that the material is logically laid out, adequately described, and is in a format that is likely to be accessible to readers.
Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. Review articles should be fewer than words for the body of the text with an unstructured abstract of up to words. Disclaimer The Publisher, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Editors cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Publisher, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Editors, neither does the publication of advertisements constitute any endorsement by the Publisher, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Editors of the products advertised.
Also, non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself.
I look for specific indicators of research quality, asking myself questions such as: Are the background literature and study rationale clearly articulated? Conclusions that are overstated or out of sync with the findings will adversely impact my review and recommendations. Potential sources of conflict of interest include, but are not limited to, patent or stock ownership, membership of a company board of directors, membership of an advisory board or committee for a company, and consultancy for or receipt of speaker's fees from a company. The full stop should not be included in abbreviations, e.
USA, 96, The review process itself will proceed in exactly the same way as in previous years. I try to stick to the facts, so my writing tone tends toward neutral. This summary statement will be ultimately published if the article is accepted. More information. This is a correspondence category only and is limited to comments about papers published in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Where relevant, blots should be scanned to obtain quantitative data. Finally, there are occasions where you get extremely exciting papers that you might be tempted to share with your colleagues, but you have to resist the urge and maintain strict confidentiality. A review is primarily for the benefit of the editor, to help them reach a decision about whether to publish or not, but I try to make my reviews useful for the authors as well. TPJ Original Research Articles that use omic- or biotechnological-approaches are welcomed, provided that new insight into the underlying biology is provided. Additionally, your data will be available to educators and the general public , most of whom do not have access to expensive journal subscriptions.
I think a lot of reviewers approach a paper with the philosophy that they are there to identify flaws.
Review Policy A peer review system involving two or more reviewers is used to ensure high quality of manuscripts accepted for publication. The information the authors provide will be included in the articles's Open Research note. Waiting another day always seems to improve the review.